![]() ![]() The biggest amount of balance issues in those 3. Although they're much better than KOF2001 and KOF2002, they're not even close to the greatness of KOF99. It's striker-dependant gameplay makes it unique, bot not in a very good way. Everyone has an infinite combo for a round using Joe, and everyone can turtle like hell using Seth. + The great amount of different characters as extra strikers is a bonus. IMO, 2k2 can't hold up against any of the other KoFs, it's my least favorite of all of them. Strikers are more abusive, overall 2k offers only a very small number of improvements compared to 99.Ģk2 I dislike - it's very fast which is good, but then there's the useless BC mode, unhealthy chara modifications, blunt graphics (better than 2k1 tho) and lame bugs. I don't like KoF2k, except for the music which is really good, specially the ending theme, and it's different compared to 2k1. I've played it countless hours since release and after all this time, I can safely say that it's one of the most competitive KoF games ever. Gameplay is tops, I really like it, but it took me a lil' while to get used to the engine. Graphically, 2k1 is one of the most horrible looking KoFs, specially the character avatars in the chara menu look like a bunch of mongoloid retards, and the backs are xtra boring, except perhaps for the Japan back, I somehow like those Japanese head bangers.
0 Comments
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |